Author Archives: Amanda Mull

Rachel Zoe Project: “I found out I was having a boy and I cried for a week. Or two. Maybe three.”

As the result of a rather hasty and informal Twitter poll yesterday, I’ve made the executive decision to recap this season of The Rachel Zoe Project. Although it doesn’t provide as many opportunities for derision and snark as Real Housewives, I’ve always found the series oddly delightful. And that’s so say nothing of the clothes porn.

And so we set out on journey through the…what season is this? Third? Fourth? It doesn’t matter. What matters is that Rachel is knocked up and she’s launching a clothing line, so there’s a whole lot more going on than just the Oscars.

We started with Rachel and Rodger back when she was six months pregnant and requiring Rodger to make her breakfast, which was Pellegrino and cranberry, as far as I could tell. For this season, Rodger has added some unfortunate facial hair to his Just Beiber haircut, and one can only hope that Rachel will be in charge of picking future hairstyles for their son. Speaking of her son, Rachel admitted right up front that she had initially been disappointed that she was having a boy, and let’s face it, we all figured that was the case. But as soon as she found cute boy clothes, everything was fixed. Despite what the show may sometimes make it seem like, Rachel is actually really easy to please. Just wave a cute outfit in front of her face!

We then followed the couple and their bean to one of the company’s four offices, which was apparently one that they don’t visit often because they couldn’t figure out how to get in the door. Once they had been buzzed in like the UPS guy, Rachel met with the head of her new line (Did we catch her name? Mandanna or Mandonna or something?) and did a little shilling, which is to be expected in a series that covers the launch of a new fashion line for all of 4.5 seconds, setting the pace for the rest of the episode and making me wonder exactly how many episodes this season will have if we’re running through plot points this quickly.

Pretty soon, Rachel went back to the styling office that we all know and love (and at which she had no problem gaining entry), where Jordan had been promoted in Brad’s absence. That gave Rachel a bit of an opportunity to talk shit about Brad, who she accused of poaching clients and pursuing the limelight after he left the business. And although I generally like Rachel, calling him out for that without giving him an opportunity to respond on the show seemed a little petty.

Besides, of course Brad took a couple of accounts with him when he left; anyone who works in an account-based business knows that happens when someone talented parts ways with a company. Plus, who cares if Brad’s going to events? I’m pretty sure there’s enough room for both of them at fashion shows and parties. The whole thing smacked of jealousy over Brad’s rising profile within the industry. In fact, didn’t they split shortly after he was profiled glowingly in the New York Times?

For me, the way she handled Brad’s departure on the show also makes me wonder about the things she said about Taylor last season. She accused her of stealing and various other nefariousness, but no specific allegations ever came about and Taylor just really didn’t seem like the type. And didn’t Rachel nearly have a heart attack because Taylor dared to style someone for an awards show after she left the company? Does she expect all of her former employees to bag groceries for a living after they leave?

The subject quickly changed to Rachel and Rodger shooting an editorial for Elle themed around John and Yoko’s famous bed-in, and I guess Rodger would be Yoko in this scenario? While Rachel was in hair and makeup, she complained that the bean eliminated half her wardrobe but gave her an added advantage when she fought with Rodger, so I guess that’s basically a wash. Next thing we knew, the wardrobe assistant’s were struggling to zip things over Rachel’s bump and they were being photographed in all white rolling around on a bed. Thankfully, they were both fully clothed. It is Elle, after all.

And then, all of a sudden, we were back at Rachel and Rodger’s house, trying to hire a new assistant. Naturally, Jeremiah, the first adorable gay guy who came in, more or less got the job right then and there. Rachel spent more time talking at him than asking him questions, and for his part, Rodger made a few off-color jokes about being “under” Rachel and they all discussed what exactly a game of dodgeball entails.

In keeping with the quick pace of the rest of the episode, we were then whisked off to tour a potential new home with Rodger and Marissa, the company’s director of operations, because Rachel was…elsewhere. I don’t know where she was. The house was palatial and cost $20,000 a month to rent, and it had a sauna. And then we sprinted directly to the next scene! Why are we rushing?!

We reconvened at Rachel’s office, where she and Rodger were meeting with a different brunette, the one whose name I never managed to catch, who was wearing the Rick Owens jacket that I own in my head. No one had actually seen any final samples yet, so they all seemed a little worried about planning the New York preview for buyers and editors that was quickly approaching. Except, wait! There’s a premiere! It’s on the same day, and it’s in LA, and now Rachel wants to rearrange the entire event to accomodate one bimbo movie star who needs a dress. Why does she pay Jordan if Jordan can’t handle dressing after the dress is chosen?

But we didn’t get an answer to that question, because first we had to interview another stylist, as if Jeremiah’s spot wasn’t already set in stone. A girl named Ashley came in who admittedly had much more experience and who seemed much more enthusiastic, plus she pronounced Proenza Schouler correctly, which is so rare that I can’t even get started on how much it bothers me when people within the industry say it incorrectly. This Ashley girl, she seemed like the perfect candidate. She seemed like a Rachel-in-training!

Ultimately, though, Rachel wanted to bring Jeremiah back in and talk to him again. Rachel would rather have a cute gay guy with fun hair around the office than yet another totally qualified female assistant, and that was just the way it was going to be. Rodger protested that Ashley was better, but let’s face it, Rodger’s not the one running the show in any real way. Rachel’s the cash cow, and what she says go, even if it makes Rodger so frustrated that his Beiber bangs get frizzy.

Naturally, when Jeremiah came back in, he admitted that most of his work was as a model and not an actual stylist or photo assistant or fashion assistant or anything that might add any kind of value to a styling business, which seemed to delight Rachel and make her even more determined to hire him. She justified it by saying that Brad hadn’t had much experience before she hired him either, but don’t I remember something about how he worked for Vogue? Did I make that up? Anyway, Jeremiah got hired. Duh. We all knew that 45 minutes ago.

Later, Marissa made the mistake of showing Rachel the pictures of the giant house that they had toured previously, which Rodger had asked her not to do since he thought it would be too big and too expensive to furnish and too much of a whirlwind to accomplish before the baby arrived. If ever you needed proof that Rodger knows his wife, that was it, because she took a single glance at the pictures of the house and demanded that they rent it. With a bit of protestation (but not too much), Rodger gave in. There’s no use arguing with a determined pregnant lady. She’ll always win, particularly when she was already a little nuts before she was pregnant.

That was that, so it was on to the next thing – Rachel’s collection, which had just magically shown up in the studio and needed to be styled and shipping back to New York as outfits by the end of the day. As luck would have it, that was also Jeremiah’s first day, and he was completely overwhelmed. That would be understandable, save for the fact that all he was asked to do was steam the garments. Not only is that not rocket science, but anyone who has ever done any kind of legitimate work in fashion, ever, has used a standard hand steamer. The fashion industry runs on hand steamers, unpaid interns and Diet Coke.

He figured it out eventually, though, and it got him an invitation to come to New York to help out with the presentation. Speaking of the presentation, if you haven’t seen the collection by now, the clothes are actually really nice. They’re a little spendy, but there’s a reason that they’ve been picked up by several major high-end department stores and some great online retailers. There’s a $550 maxi dress in the line that I would stab someone in order to obtain, but considering the price tag, I’ll probably abstain. Still, Rachel’s duds seem to be the real deal, which is more than I can say for basically any other person who I can think of who has a reality TV show.

That more or less covers it for this episode, but with plenty of high-pressure situations to come, there are surely plenty of meltdowns and Chanel jackets left to be seen in this season. And at the pace the producers have set, we might see them all in the span of an hour next week.

L’Wren Scott gives you two bags for the price of one in her handbag debut

L’Wren Scott Lulu Python Satchel, $4307 via Matches

Admittedly, it’s two bags for the price of one still-quite-expensive handbag, but just look at ‘em! It’s kind of hard to find fault with structured dark grey snakeskin, in my very humble (ok, not-so-humble) opinion. The L’Wren Scott Large Lulu Python Tote echoes the design of L’Wren’s famous dresses – strong, modern and tailored to great effect.

When introducing a new segment of a brand, I can’t stress how important it is to ensure that the new products have some sort of aesthetic connection to the old ones. If you already have a dedicated audience that’s willing to spend money (lots of money) on the things that you make, failing to cater to those people with new products doesn’t make any sense. And yet, every year, brands come out with bags that have seemingly nothing to do with the brand images they’ve worked so hard to create with the other parts of their lines.

That’s a pitfall that Scott has avoided splendidly. Her ultra-tailored dresses are the stuff of buy-on-in-every-color legend in the high-end ready-to-wear market, and an exotic but restrained satchel perfectly translates that into the accessories world. Including the clutch wallet with the large model is perhaps a small stroke of genius, because it gives the purchase a sense of value; an added incentive for existing customers to get their feet wet with the handbag line, if you will. Whether you’re already a L’Wren Scott fan or not, this bag is totally worth a look. Buy through Matches for $4307.

RHBH: “A lot of dogs get jealous of Giggy.”

I’m not even sure how to start this recap of Real Housewives of Beverly Hills, except to say that in the grand tradition of the entertainment industry and famewhoring in general, the show went on as planned last night. Of course, that was in spite of the suicide of Taylor Armstrong’s estranged husband Russell, who had been featured prominently as part of one of the season’s major plot lines.

The premiere episode was recut slightly to feature a scene where all of the housewives gathered to discuss the death, but then things went on almost exactly as planned, based on what I’ve heard about preview episodes that had been sent out before Russell’s death. It remains to be seen how the rest of the season will handle the suicide, but let’s get to the business of last night’s episode, shall we?

We started on a very somber, very recent note. All of the Housewives (minus Taylor, plus a few husbands) gathered together at Adrienne’s house to talk about their feelings and thoughts on Russell’s suicide. Lisa and Kyle both thought that the problems stemmed from the pressures of the family’s financial collapse, and they all said that they had never felt any kind of personal connection with Russell, perhaps because of the negative things that Taylor had said about their relationship. All of the cast mates also expressed a hope that Taylor didn’t feel responsible in any way, because the choice to end his life was Russell’s alone.

The choice to get out in front of the suicide and address it first prevented us from having to wait all season for the other shoe to drop and Russell’s death to come up as part of the plot, which was a choice that I appreciated. It seemed as though relatively little editing was done to the premiere other than editing in that few minutes of footage, so it’ll be interesting to see if, when and how often we see or hear about Russell as the show moves forward.

And then, almost inexplicably, it was back to our previously scheduled Real Housewives of Beverly Hills shenanigans, already in progress. Lisa and Giggy met up with Lisa’s daughter Pandora at a hair salon to have various treatments and fancy things done. Giggy sat on Lisa’s lap and rested his chin on the nail table, practically daring everyone at home not to melt. Meanwhile, Pandora’s boyfriend was back at the house, asking Ken for Pandora’s hand in marriage. We all know my feelings about that sort of thing, but since I like Lisa and Ken a lot, I’ll let it go.

Our next stop was Kyle’s house, where she and Mauricio were packing up to move to a new, bigger house. Somehow that lead to talk of Kyle and Kim’s relationship, which is still completely broken. Kim has chosen not to return Kyle’s calls, although she thinks they’ll solve things and have a great relationship again one day. She just doesn’t know when that day will be, which resulted in some teary regrets on Kyle’s part. Berating your sister for being an alcoholic on a trashy reality show: Perhaps not such a great idea.

Then it was on to Camille’s house, where she was tooling around the enormous grounds in a golf cart to go say hi to her horse and check out the giant mountain of furniture that had apparently been freight shipped to her from her former house in the Hamptons by Kelsey. The mountain also contained her “Hamptons Shoe Wardrobe,” which shouldn’t technically be capitalized, but it sort of feels right, yes? It seemed to be comprised entirely of out-of-style strappy lime green sandals, which sounds about right based on the average taste level of a Real Housewife. And speaking of people who don’t talk, Camille and Kelsey are also on that list.

Of course, we had to head to see the Maloof-Nassifs next, who were terrorizing their private chef over some party menu. Paul wanted maybe guacamole, or maybe something with apples, or maybe sweet potato fries? But no Waldorf salad, because apples and mayo is crazytown, you guys. Who would eat something weird and exotic like Waldorf salad? Paul couldn’t imagine such a thing. The chef seemed ready to stab both of them with his Lime Green Knife of Insanity, a feeling that most of the household staff must have often in the homes of Beverly Hills.

Naturally, the party that would include the offending apple-mayo salad would also include our Housewives, which meant that Kyle needed to go shopping. She met up with Taylor at a boutique, and seeing Taylor walk into the frame was oddly jarring. I had fully prepared myself to not see her in the premiere at all, although I’m not sure why I assumed that she would be completely removed from the first episode; Bravo never said that she would be. Her first scene involved some uninteresting gossip about running into Lisa’s former permanent houseguest Cedric and how Lisa isn’t very nice to her. Kyle thinks its because Lisa is British and not particularly warm, I think it’s because she just doesn’t particularly like Taylor. I guess we’ll find out who’s right later in the season. (I think it’s me.)

Our next stop was Adrienne’s house for the party preparations, and it seemed as though I missed an earlier mention that the party was a screening for Camille’s episode of “[Bleep] My Dad Says,” probably because I was trying to evaluate Adrienne’s newest facial updates. (An upgrade, I think.) I’m sure that some conversation of some sort was also had during the pre-party, but I was too busy gawking at Adrienne’s glassed-in shoe closet to hear words or think thoughts. Add “glassed-in shoe closet” to my list of life goals.

Pretty soon, the rest of the Housewives arrived and I was unable to hear or think for a completely different reason – Kim’s suit. Someone actually told her it was great, although that might have been Kyle trying to be overly nice to patch things up, I can’t remember exactly. What I do remember is that it looked like it had come straight from the cast-off pile outside of the wardrobe closet at Dynasty. It had some kind of weird embroidery or beading around the lapels, and it was just…bad. Very bad. Very bad in a similar way that her pearl choker set was bad on last season’s finale, which makes me think that those items aren’t flukes, they’re actual things that Kim likes. That’s way worse.

In spite of all that, the entire group was able to put aside their differences and stop cringing at Kim’s suit long enough to watch Camille’s episode, in which she good-naturedly made fun of herself and generally scored a couple of points for the minimum required amount of self-awareness. Since she completely lacked it last season, we’ll count that as progress. At this point, things were ticking along reasonably, both at the party and in the episode.

And then everyone sat down to dinner, and we all know what happens when these people are forced to sit around a table and look at each other. Paul flicked a napkin with some champagne on it at Adrienne, and she flipped out and told him he was being rude, condescending and all-around ruining the dinner party. She also told him he wasn’t funny, which seemed like an extra step of meanness which even he wasn’t expecting. Paul just sat there, stunned, and didn’t fight back. They both seemed to enjoy their spats last season, so I can’t help but wonder if we’re going to see some issues with their relationship later on.

In other couples news, Paul asked Taylor how she and Russell were doing with their marriage, and she revealed that they had spent a lot of time in therapy and that they were trying to improve things. The wives started discussing whether or not their men would go, and Ken piped up to say that he’d never go and he wouldn’t want his wife to go either. Even under normal circumstances, those kinds of statements would seem awfully cavalier, but in light of Russell’s (who was not present) suicide, they were beyond the pale. I’m stunned that Bravo left in anything about how people who go to therapy are weak, considering the aftermath.

Unsurprisingly, Taylor was hurt and got up from the table without defending herself, and Kyle got up and followed her. They spoke in the bathroom for a while and then Lisa popped in to re-gloss her lips and assess the situation, with no apparent intent to smooth anything over. When everyone returned to the table except Taylor, Kyle explained that she thought Taylor might have been a tad offended (which she should have been, even though I love Lisa and Ken).

Ken got offended that she used the word offended, and as Kyle mentioned, all of these off-limits words are getting just a tad tedious – we still can’t say “insecure” because it makes Camille’s head explode, right? And then Ken let Giggy drink some $2200 champagne out of the gold-trimmed champagne glass, just to cap everything off. I’d explain that $2200 is more or less the monthly take-home pay for most people under the age of 25 in the fashion industry, but thinking about it too hard just makes me want to go back to bed. Earlier in the evening, we heard about how other dogs are jealous of Giggy because of his wardrobe and how beautiful he is. If nothing else, Ken and Lisa need to be in therapy to sort out their obsession with the dog.

Taylor eventually came out and Ken backpeddled just a tad, at which point Adrienne stepped in to smooth things over and move the conversation on, a skill that she seems to have with everyone but her husband. Lisa glowered, Ken bristled, Kyle scowled and Camille sat idly by, simply pleased to not be part of the argument. Eventually the awkwardness got so thick that Ken and Lisa excused themselves from the party and the curtain came down on the first episode.

As far as how Bravo did in dealing with Russell’s suicide, I’m a little split. On the one hand, I’m surprised that the show wasn’t delayed or the episode more heavily edited, particularly the last scene and all of its therapy-bashing, which would have seemed needlessly insensitive even under normal circumstances. On the other hand, I’m not sure that Bravo could have done anything that would have seemed totally right, save for scrapping the show entirely. And we all know Bravo; there’s no way in a million years that they’d actually do that.

Then, of course, there’s the business of the preview that always comes at the end of a season premiere. I’m displeased that Lisa appears to be one of the chief villains this season and I refuse to believe that she actually did anything wrong, but I’m also optimistic about the chances that “CRYSTAL METH WHORE!” will become the new “PROSTITUTION WHORE!” even though it is missing the brilliant redundancy of Teresa’s famous proclamation.

Labor Day, a crossbody bag and the silliest tan line I’ve ever had

I should start by saying that I’m not a tanner. I’m naturally very fair and have no desire to change that, and even if I did, the desire to engage in the sort of extended outdoor activity that creates a tan is also not really in my wheelhouse. Among the reasons that I chose to move to New York is that I’m comfortable having only a casual relationship with things like grass and trees.

That being said, I put on my best maxi dress and headed to watch the QuickSilver Pro New York surf competition on Long Island with some friends this past weekend, because who can turn down a trip to the beach on the last weekend of summer? Of all outdoor places, the beach has always been my favorite. But since I’m not much of a weekend warrior, my preparations for a day outside were…insufficient. For the next six months, everyone’s going to be able to tell what kind of handbag I carried this weekend.

I could have sworn I bought a bottle of sunscreen at the beginning of summer. If I did, I have no idea what I did with it, but I couldn’t find it on Sunday morning when I was scrambling to make it to Penn Station on time. (Mornings, like the outdoors, are another thing to which I’m ill-suited.) “That’s fine,” I thought. “New York is full of drug stores! I’ll go to the Duane Reade next to my subway stop.” Except, naturally, that’s the only Duane Reade I’ve ever encountered that’s not open 24 hours. I went into the K-Mart at Penn Station, but inexplicably, it only sold clothes. It’s been a minute since I’ve been inside a K-Mart, but most of them sell toiletries, right?

And so that’s how I ended up on Long Beach with no sunscreen, a strapless maxi dress and a crossbody purse. I managed to stay inside or shaded most of the day, but my skin is very fair and total coverage is impossible at the beach. Surveying the damage the day after, one thing is very apparent: Don’t wear a crossbody bag when you’re going to be outside all day. Perhaps those of you who are more acquainted with such activities learned this long ago, but I now have a stripe of pale skin running diagonally across my sunburnt chest.

So ladies, take note. It might be too late in the season to prevent your own crossbody-related problems, but it’s never too early to prepare for next summer. A backpack, a tote bag, one of those big things made out of woven hard plastic that has to be carried be hand – almost any bag you can think of will lead to less sunburn embarrassment than a crossbody at the beach. Learn from my mistakes, because my tans fade slowly and I’ll have my stripe for six months. Although I suppose that if anyone were to be semi-permanently marked by her handbags, it’s appropriate that it was me. As far as I can tell, my problem can only be solved by wearing that same bag every day to fill the gap, but luckily, I have it in two colors.

Introducing Petra and Tamara Ecclestone, LA’s newest paparazzi obsession

Are you familiar with Petra Ecclestone and her sister Tamara Ecclestone, recent transplants to Beverly Hills from London and daughters of Formula 1 Racing head (and billionaire) Bernie Ecclestone? I wasn’t until last week when I read that Petra (she’s the blonde) was launching a handbag line for fall, and it seems as though now that I’ve heard the name, I keep seeing mentions and photos of the two everywhere. Petra, 22, first made a splash last year when she and her new husband bought the former Spelling mansion, which is the largest private residence in all of Los Angeles County. Not bad for your first home with your new hubby.

Petra’s sister Tamara seems to be slightly more low-key, but it looks as though they’re both quickly becoming fixtures on the Los Angeles social and paparazzi scene. Here they are, out for a day of shopping, both toting Hermes Birkins in lime and white. I’m partial to Petra’s choice of lime green, particularly against a black dress, but white isn’t too shabby either. I can’t wait to see what kinds of handbags these two girls trot out while their fame (infamy?) is at its peak.

Bag Petra and Tamara’s Hermes Style via Hermes.com!

Would you carry something as minimal as these Rochas bags?

Rochas Giallo Tote Bag, $1065. Rochas Borsa R18 Sporco Bag, $1695. Both via Saks.

Despite the fact that I have chosen maximalism as my overarching aesthetic theme, I have a healthy respect for those who do minimal and do it well. During the days of Olivier Theyskens, Rochas was never accused of embracing minimalism, but now that the brand’s creative vision has changed hands, the brand’s most widely available foray into handbags yet has lines so straight that my back aches just looking at them. Would you carry something like the Rochas Giallo Tote Bag (left) or the Rochas Borsa R18 Sporco Bag, or do you want your bags to be a little bit more detailed?

Personally, I’d be all over the bright yellow tote. Minimal designs work so well in bright colors because they let the color shine as the principle detail, instead of having neon yellow compete with pockets, zippers, ruching and hardware for the spotlight. The reverse works, as well: Neons and brights bring out the clean, restrained lines that are so important in a minimal aesthetic.

The white bag, on the other hand, I could do without. Although white is one of the most important colors in minimalism, the combination of white with the traditional shape and the subtly scolloped edge of the top flap create a look that’s a little bit too ladylike for my personal style. I do, however, adore the contrasting snake-print top handle. So what do you say, ladies? Would you be first in line to carry either of these bags? Buy through Saks for $1065 and $1695, respectively.

This Nancy Gonzalez bag looks a wee bit familiar…

Nancy Gonzalez Metallic Crocodile Tote, $4000 via Net-a-Porter

As you guys are often quick to note, I’m usually the last person to say, “Hey, doesn’t this bag look like the design was lifted entirely from that bag?” Let’s face it, there are only so many shapes, sizes, leathers, handles and pocket configurations out there, and it’s boring to make de facto rules about who can and cannot use quilted leather and chain straps.

That being said, I took one look at the Nancy Gonzalez Metallic Crocodile Tote, and all I could think was “Celine Luggage Tote.” I even set aside the product page for a few days so that I could think about it, and the must-have Celine bag is still all I see when I look at this tote. Nancy Gonzalez normally does a great job of doing her own thing with little regard for passing trends or ideas, but this bag seems like a rather egregious example of the exact opposite.

There are a couple key pieces of the Celine bag that make it so recognizable: The north-south proportion, the jutting gussets, the front pocket and the bordered front panel. Thankfully, this bag doesn’t reproduce the thick, curvy piping that you find on the most sought-after luggage totes, but some models lack that in favor of straight border panels, which is what you have here. You also have all of the other recognizable feature, even though the pocket has a flap instead of a zipper and the handles are flat instead of rolled. What this bag does lack, though, is Celine’s casual, new-modern French elegance. That’s much harder to reproduce, unfortunately. Buy through Net-a-Porter for $4000.

Surprise, surprise, Blake Lively’s carrying Chanel

Actually bothering to write paragraphs about Blake Lively carrying a Chanel 2.55 Flap Bag seems kind of silly; we all know that she’s Karl Lagerfeld‘s flavor of the month, and product placement is pretty easy to come by on Gossip Girl. But in this case, the bag is good enough to discuss.

In fact, this foil-y cobalt blue version of the 2.55 might be my favorite of all time. It’s vibrant and modern while still being one of Coco’s classic designs, and it feels much more fresh and relevant in this finish that it does in basic Chanel black. If I had to pick a Chanel bag to add to my closet right now, it would be this one. Metallic blue is just trendy enough to look really amazing right now, but the historical shape means that this bag will never, ever go out of style. More of this, please, Chanel.

Bag Blake’s Chanel Style via Chanel.com!

Isabel Marant wants you to dress like a Native American Parisian (What?)

Isabel Marant Melly Embroidered Bag, $1235. Isabel Marant Malou Emebellished Suede Clutch, $1080. Both via Net-a-Porter.

Watch out, I’m about to commit fashion blasphemy: I find Isabel Marant a bit tedious. I like her clothing on an aesthetic level, of course. There’s a reason that every supermodel and editor this side of Berlin are photographed wearing Marant almost constantly; her work is impeccable. But between her revulsion over women with breasts and her tone-deaf appropriation of the prints of native cultures that the Western world has almost entirely obliterated, she seems hell-bent on inhabiting every negative French stereotype that comes to mind.

That being said, I would wear the beads off of that burgundy bag up there. The Isabel Marant Malou Embellished Suede Clutch. Yep, and I’d hate myself a little bit for it. Why do people who annoy me have to make such pretty things sometimes?

It still strikes me as odd that a designer known for her enduring French-ness decided to take her Fall 2011 work in a direction that’s clearly based on Native America, but hey, maybe she watched Dances with Wolves and got all inspired or something. From my tone by itself, I think you guys can pretty clearly read my internal confusion on these bags. On the one hand, I’ve grown tired of fashion fawning over someone who comes across as at least a little bit vapid. On the other hand, I really dig these bags and they’re not terribly priced, another thing for which Marant is known.

I’m so conflicted, you guys. Buy through Net-a-Porter for $1235 and $1080, respectively.

Isabel Marant wants you to dress like a Native American Parisian (What?)

Isabel Marant Melly Embroidered Bag, $1235. Isabel Marant Malou Emebellished Suede Clutch, $1080. Both via Net-a-Porter.

Watch out, I’m about to commit fashion blasphemy: I find Isabel Marant a bit tedious. I like her clothing on an aesthetic level, of course. There’s a reason that every supermodel and editor this side of Berlin are photographed wearing Marant almost constantly; her work is impeccable. But between her revulsion over women with breasts and her tone-deaf appropriation of the prints of native cultures that the Western world has almost entirely obliterated, she seems hell-bent on inhabiting every negative French stereotype that comes to mind.

That being said, I would wear the beads off of that burgundy bag up there. The Isabel Marant Malou Embellished Suede Clutch. Yep, and I’d hate myself a little bit for it. Why do people who annoy me have to make such pretty things sometimes?

It still strikes me as odd that a designer known for her enduring French-ness decided to take her Fall 2011 work in a direction that’s clearly based on Native America, but hey, maybe she watched Dances with Wolves and got all inspired or something. From my tone by itself, I think you guys can pretty clearly read my internal confusion on these bags. On the one hand, I’ve grown tired of fashion fawning over someone who comes across as at least a little bit vapid. On the other hand, I really dig these bags and they’re not terribly priced, another thing for which Marant is known.

I’m so conflicted, you guys. Buy through Net-a-Porter for $1235 and $1080, respectively.